NCAA Benefit While Student-athlete Struggle
Hal Roberson
ENG 131.01
Professor Lucas
13 April 2016
NCAA Benefit While Student-athletes Struggle
Introduction
Growing up as a child watching college football, I was amazed at the huge impact college sports such as football and basketball had on people’s lives. It created an escape for people, it gave people something to look forward to on their weekends and it gave people a reason to interact with one another. Sports and the athletes that play, seem as if they’re having the time of their lives, and from personal experience, I’ll have to agree that yes, they are having an extreme amount of fun. There’s more than what’s being shown on the television, when we watch analysts on shows such as Sports Center, College Football, First Take, and plenty others, you would think that college sports was professional. The only thing that separates them from the pros according to the NCAA is the fact that college athletes aren’t being paid for their performance. I believe regardless if it would make them professional athletes or not, college athletes should be paid for representing the school.
The NCAA sells merchandise such as jerseys and videogames based on the likeness of a certain player and team that competes in collegiate sports. In USA Today’s Sports, Steve Berkowitz mentions that “The NCAA had total revenue of nearly $1 Billion during its 2014 fiscal year”, this is a result from athletes who only play sports just for the love of it but how long will that love last? Sure, some athletes are on scholarship and most of them don’t have to pay out of pocket for items such as books and a place to live; but for most a paid education isn’t enough. There are athletes whose parents struggle financially and aren’t able to give them money for things such as being able to keep clean clothes or purchase food. In Fortune.com’s article, “The plaintiff’s argued that the NCAA was a cartel whose rules made schools wealthy while athletes received little to none of the profits..” which I something I completely agree with. Athletes sacrifice so much to receive so little.
One might ask if an athlete struggles so much financially, why aren’t they able to get a job. Well first off, not everyone perceives a college athlete the same. On paper they’re a student first but if the coach was to tell everyone else what he tells the athlete, they’ll understand that the term “Student-Athlete” doesn’t exist. For me, personally, I’ll have to admit that I think more about football than my academics because of how time, consuming it is. Between meetings, workouts, practice and for others rehab, the last thing on any athletes mind is the thousand word essay due the next day. Of course we can say the athlete is responsible for their education, but in all honesty we’re talking about young adults who are no longer living under the rules of their parents a type of freedom that most haven’t ever experienced. The NCAA is taking advantage of kids who don’t really understand what they’re worth and the benefits that others are receiving because of their talent.
The NCAA tells the supposed to be student-athlete that they’re receiving a free education, when in reality they’re not able to take of advantage of it. In Sports Illustrated they mentioned that, “ Michigan State players missed six of nine class days, and they would likely have missed four more if they had made it to the title game.” If college athletes are that occupied with sports to where they’re not even able to be given a chance to excel in the classroom, then the student part of student-athlete no longer exists. Within the Sports Illustrated article, the writer states that, “The idea that these guys are primarily students is farcical.” The NCAA is contradicting themselves and selling athletes coming into college lies. The NCAA and even some college coaches are guilty of only caring about the athlete’s performance, not about whether or not they’ve received a quality education. As long as the athlete is eligible to play, the NCAA could care less.
Annotated Bibliography
Kopytoff, Verne. “Judge Deal Major Blow To NCAA By Ruling Athletes Can Be Paid.”Fortune.com (2014):1. Business Source Premier.Web.30 Apr. 2016
The author Verne Kopytoff wrote this article describing what was being discussed in court involving the NCAA views on paying college athletes as well as others views on the subject as well. The judge seems to somewhat lean more toward athletes being paid for their participation in NCAA athletics. Leaving the NCAA worried about the possibility for college athletes being compensated for their participation in college athletics.
This article supports my argument because it shows how the NCAA benefits from the likeness of a student-athlete but the student-athlete isn’t receiving the same benefits as they are. The athlete is in indeed receiving a valuable education but after their bodies have been worn out after all of the things they’ve done physically, they should receive some kind of compensation.
“College Athletes Deserve More Compensation.” USA Today n.d.: Academic Search Premier. Web. 10 Apr. 2016
This article is based upon the comments made by people on Facebook used by USA Today, to show others views and beliefs on whether or not NCAA athletes should be paid for playing sports that are highly profitable such as football and basketball. Some actually are against it and feel as if student-athletes are already awarded enough just for being on the team.
The article presents both sides of the pay-for-play argument. Even though the majority of the comments that people posted on Facebook leaned more towards the belief that student-athletes should be compensated, it still shows what others may think when discussing this subject.
Steve, Berkowitz, @By Berkowitz, and Sports USA Today. “NCAA has $80 M Surplus.”USA Today n.d.: Newspaper Source Plus. Web 10 Apr. 2016
Steve Berkowitz wrote an article that was perfect for what I needed to support my thesis. Stating facts about the NCAA and how much they profit from NCAA Basketball alone. The article provides numbers and statistics that help show how much sports contribute to the NCAA. This supports the compensation of student-athletes because it shows that they are able to pay both basketball and football athletes and specifically those two sports since they produce the most money out of the other sports.
The author provides us with the source of income for these sports. The article reveals that the majority of the profits come from agreements with CBS and Turner Broadcasting. These television agreements led to, “$700 million in fiscal 2014 and growing at a rate of about 3% a year” and “The association had particularly good revenue growth in 2014, in part because the Final Four”. Is a perfect example of how the NCAA benefits from athletes you have invested hours of preparation just so that there could be a Final Four.
Rosenberg, Michael. “Workers’ Comp.” Sports Illustrated 120.14 (2014): 64. Academic Search Premier. Web.2 May 2016
This Sports Illustrated article presents the struggle most student-athletes may face when trying to balance both sports and their academics. The writer Michael Rosenberg explains why it’s difficult for college athletes to be present in their classes and how it’s almost impossible for an athlete to be a student. Rosenberg makes statements that questions the NCAA’s views on college athletes and whether or not they actually care for the athlete’s education.
This article supports my argument in various ways such as, the NCAA’s perception of student-athletes and the disadvantages that they face. Of course, college athletes are supposed to have all the advantages due to the time and effort they put into the sport that they play as well as the education that they’re struggling to receive. The disadvantage that college athletes face is the fact that the NCAA fools everyone to believe that athletes are able to take advantage of those advantages.